For example, on the one hand, the paradigm described at the beginning helps view the objective reality by outlining the arguments that are provided by various sources, thus, facilitating objectivity. The Paradigm Effect can be observed in each of the frameworks described above. 18), it was originally designed for marketing and commerce, yet seems to be applicable to a variety of other domains. Incorporating three key elements, i.e., strategic planning, management control and operational control (Courtney, 2001, p. Incorporating three key elements, it can be defined as a more precise and elaborate model, as it helps predict the possible outcomes in a more accurate manner and suggest a more adequate method of tackling the issues that may emerge. Particularly, the paradigm suggested by Courtney (2001) needs to be brought up as the basis for decision making. Naturally, apart from the above-mentioned design for facilitating change, other frameworks for handling the issue exist. More importantly, the paradigm under analysis helps adapt towards changes in practically any domain of my life, be it the personal or the professional one. Therefore, the subject matter can be considered a tool for identifying, assessing, and adapting to certain changes. The paradigm allows for efficient decision-making, which, in its turn, can be viewed as a part of promoting change within a specific environment. The paradigm of decision-making mentioned above promotes change in my personal and professional life, as it helps identify the effects of a certain step that will be made in the foreseeable future. Consequently, the decision that will eventually be made may turn out to be somewhat biased and lacking objectivity. The paradigm mentioned above, however, does not involve the stage of verifying the credibility of resources. Indeed, the abundance of facts and the availability of information that the present-day media has to offer require that one should be able to discriminate between the credible sources and the ones that require an additional check. Particularly, the fact that the process of data gathering does not presuppose identifying trustworthy sources deserves to be listed among the key disadvantages. Negative ConsequenceĪlthough the specified pattern for making a decision can be considered rather reasonable, a closer look at the way, in which the paradigm occurs, will reveal that the latter has a few dents in it. Positive ConsequenceĪmong the key positive consequences, which the above-mentioned paradigm has led to in my life, successful solution of major problems can be considered the prime effect thereof. The order, in which I traditionally make decisions (colleting the information from all resources available, sorting the information based on certain criteria, identifying the existing avenues, defining the positive and negative outcomes of each, locating the optimum solution and finally implementing it), can be considered an example of a paradigm that is typical for my daily routine. By aligning them organically or strategically, we can finally move past the status quo, towards a new paradigm of wealth, health, equity, and quality of life.A paradigm is a specific pattern, which can be observed within a certain phenomenon and which reoccurs within a specific time period. These include power, knowledge, and conflict. While gaps remain in the research on social change and transformation, social scientists have begun to identify the key drivers in establishing, maintaining, and changing social systems. For instance, the sharing economy has broken through a cultural norm of materialism and the United Nation’s Gross National Happiness Index puts forth a new definition of national well-being, beyond economic gain.īut what are the mechanics of a paradigm shift? How do they come to be? And how can we catalyze one?Ĭlimate change, one of society’s most pressing problems, demands drastic transformation in our energy, cultural, and governance systems. Since then, the concept has been applied in many non-scientific contexts really, in any case where a profound change has resulted from a fundamental shift in approach or underlying assumptions. Examples of these deep shifts in our mental models include when astronomers realized the sun was the center of the universe, instead of the earth, or when naturalists planted the seed that all living things evolved from the same ancestor. Used originally to describe the nature and structure of scientific revolutions, the concept of a “paradigm shift” was first articulated by the American physicist Thomas Kuhn in 1962. On the subject of revolution… what does a paradigm shift even mean?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |